X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.129.88.6 with SMTP id m6mr20052617ywb.3.1434136066300;
        Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.102.66 with SMTP id v60mr254104qge.19.1434136066280;
 Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:07:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <510f0bc7-7911-4d22-bfca-48716371ecb5@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.5.91.182; posting-account=OsAajgoAAADdKJnkJkmhzqP0jo6I_P_0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.5.91.182
References: <201506091712 DOT t59HCPci004068 AT delorie DOT com> <557739E0 DOT 6070608 AT gmail DOT com>
 <CAB9Rao93XrKFBpUDnZdjCz+rEXHGOU2RNKdou2oMLJOk802LnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <55775E64 DOT 2090901 AT gmail DOT com> <CAB9Rao-Njdr-CB=vqHnb+TVDmXu3eXqsB5CHB7V0kDwBEsM-WQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <5579ED42 DOT 6070309 AT gmail DOT com> <bedfae3f-2695-4253-8d9c-11c55703f8b5 AT googlegroups DOT com>
 <83616ts7gt DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <510f0bc7-7911-4d22-bfca-48716371ecb5 AT googlegroups DOT com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <62ce8a0c-20af-4bd9-b5d1-3ba283aecfed@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: DJGGP 2.05 upgrade problems.
From: "Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 19:07:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Bytes: 2227
Lines: 15
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t5CJF16T004345
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 2:56:58 PM UTC+2, rug DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com wrote:
[snip]
> I'm just saying, DJGPP has enough to worry with, but worrying about
> minor tools is probably not (yet) top priority. Anyways, at the
> very least, such things (Find or File+Txt+Shl) should probably
> be recompiled with 2.05 *before* trying to debug anything.


OFYI, I  have recompiled File+Txt+Shl using repository code and the nmalloc patch in 2014-10-12.  I do not know if the repository code has changed so match that a recompiling is required again.  I do not thing that these files may cause any difficulties when used with WinXP.


Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero