X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Yyy+HpiskeVV9diPUHkX0lk1NOwL58aY6hVFBerP2Eg=;
        b=EPAmq6D0ZvB2QHjXD1iHELC0+ceET3/xYdv2Y52YL56xsHIm8wWw8mln8v11R8DB/c
         Aw7k5c6fKs+3RN9L3QIRWFAYQ8fu54kfIy7dA7XMOno9lGt458ksRLDx5kZpv9CrB1Uv
         8o+V1DojhjDJDZJ4NsPST6PA5Q3J9fEZ7Uto2vUJLCkDrDfg6ZJI3Z/nATSX0RcFoi6B
         suXRsdcbSjnE+XLcFQZOLzMB+59lD6lh0v8RxvO9NuTyuPi9p2YkJddrCS9fp6l/Qrls
         dGs47gItu90JlogClIJpQMTL5uCTazlMHxP+QCU49oblkJe0gkeAl1ZiAuWAHakLMwLk
         veqA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.61.241 with SMTP id t17mr5044507igr.34.1433621588784;
 Sat, 06 Jun 2015 13:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201506061940.t56Jeb4I032016@envy.delorie.com>
References: <55673F0B DOT 1090103 AT iki DOT fi>
	<83twuwwshg DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<55675040 DOT 9030008 AT iki DOT fi>
	<556F6E49 DOT 8010006 AT gmx DOT de>
	<556FCCDF DOT 7080005 AT iki DOT fi>
	<83bngvr0ef DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<557078B1 DOT 9040004 AT iki DOT fi>
	<201506041613 DOT t54GDT8m014488 AT delorie DOT com>
	<5570B1F7 DOT 1070509 AT iki DOT fi>
	<83pp5aprqw DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<20150606054809 DOT 810 AT kylheku DOT com>
	<201506061940 DOT t56Jeb4I032016 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 23:13:08 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vBxEF51GSJ=d2LwsnkdA5FSVf5jOaz+pX5TxDthb8oHUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DJGPP v2.05: some thoughts
From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 6/6/15, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> The purpose of --ansi (or other C dialect selectors) is to affect the
>> C dialect used, not the libraries (which are not even part of GCC).
>
> The ANSI standard is more than just a dialect.  It defines a runtime
> as well.  So if the user asks for "ANSI compliance" we must comply
> with the ANSI runtime standards.
>
> Note that glibc does this also.
>

At least not for errno.h