X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:59:36 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org)" Subject: Re: DJGPP v2.05: some thoughts In-reply-to: <557220E9.7040302@verizon.net> X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-id: <83fv65nwyv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <55673F0B DOT 1090103 AT iki DOT fi> <83twuwwshg DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <55675040 DOT 9030008 AT iki DOT fi> <556F6E49 DOT 8010006 AT gmx DOT de> <556FCCDF DOT 7080005 AT iki DOT fi> <83bngvr0ef DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <557078B1 DOT 9040004 AT iki DOT fi> <201506041613 DOT t54GDT8m014488 AT delorie DOT com> <5570B1F7 DOT 1070509 AT iki DOT fi> <83pp5aprqw DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <834mmmp7f0 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83zj4enfns DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <557220E9 DOT 7040302 AT verizon DOT net> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "James Kuyper (jameskuyper AT verizon DOT net)" > Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 18:21:29 -0400 > > It seems pretty clear to me that 7.1.3p1 applies to names described by > rules specified in a given clause (such as the rule given in 7.5p4), and > not just to names that are explicitly listed in those clauses. > > If that weren't the case, the cross-reference to "future library > directions" (7.31), could have been made far more specific. My reading of the standard is that "future library directions" refers to places that describe future development. Saying that an implementation _may_ included other macros does not describe any future directions, IMO. It just says what an implementation can do without violating the standard.