X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 17:27:33 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org)" Subject: Re: New GDB versions and DJGPP (Was: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1) In-reply-to: <5562A0D8.8070809@iki.fi> X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-id: <83siakzq96.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com> <555829A6 DOT 8010502 AT iki DOT fi> <555870E8 DOT 7040302 AT iki DOT fi> <201505180114 DOT t4I1EiaX017288 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201505181216 DOT t4ICGaKO014123 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <83zj52dkns DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <555A0DD5 DOT 1010607 AT iki DOT fi> <83r3qdemuj DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <555AADE6 DOT 3030905 AT iki DOT f> <83lhgkehn4 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <201505191714 DOT t4JHEr0B010992 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <83vbfo7a74 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <201505191729 DOT t4JHTIRe011541 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <83sias77km DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <555CFF9C DOT 1050301 AT gmx DOT de> <555D5E30 DOT 7020107 AT iki DOT fi> <83vbfl6hs9 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <55618917.7@[87.69.4.28]> <83d21q1g6n DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <55623666 DOT 7060908 AT iki DOT fi> <83twv1z8j4 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5562A0D8 DOT 8070809 AT iki DOT fi> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 07:11:04 +0300 > From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi)" > > On 05/25/2015 05:38 AM, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) wrote: > > - got also DJGPP related compile error which is potentially related to latest changes, but I did > > not have time to check whether it so > > Please report the error messages, either here or to the GDB mailing > > list. > > > It is related to gdb/gnulib/import headers instead (included from gdb/djgpp/vsnprintf.c). This file > belongs to DJGPP related changes I rebased onto current master branch. > > We do not need gdb/djgpp/vsnprintf.c for upcoming DJGPP v2.05, so I simply commented it out for > testing. If we don't need vsnprintf, then why does the configure script think we do?