X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=oxIdDT8B1ki879run/JYI5n8F5xhyjdtlst1nrKK9mg=;
        b=CFuPtm2eawO60BAZz+pI1Ulh8tZqJZMUPE9N0ztZgjU8SV5YIh+w6d4S1mDkt9IFN1
         0hxaEYQItF91qR1oRLGF4Sy7sPA0Ai+Dhod8kMr3hc9B0Ubx3ul5XU+rRcaPU2UDTp2H
         N0tLHhQ61rzifXVKfRMcafMy2UoQXmnkF3AffGJuZDkyTmtv7GVGS7hMrN6lnjfr1KEr
         pZIFnNFRG2ysJVTcNIx70on8o7xm6/T4GIz7CHVlLMtmVNCtbHbOKP/5XVbXUYQUV1Vs
         3Lgq+5xiwi8ukPnl1mme+d/S7z35zT7ZTZjyAuKlNgJeaOV0QfecnqX3GCxs+zQvf7lj
         P+ig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.227 with SMTP id z3mr15901949igl.22.1431968345977;
 Mon, 18 May 2015 09:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <83twv9espx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vAjN-HamFRWCQak=QF_NPjR5-TBYZw1U5707MO0b=qXkw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<554DF584 DOT 4020309 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vDaOJb_RW2bQEFoM_cqwp7yhzwX-CB328r5GCCi6XcooA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55501DAD DOT 1080604 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vAvMW-yquZLSN=Z39NU24Kqf7urjan90801i7BDTdqOvQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55579278 DOT 8090301 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vBaQKzmch_buxFm20DJLcG+zv6d6803+qMEx=baA4Frog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<555829A6 DOT 8010502 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vA73qPvoDFytp3FeW6bCD1-XuGsFFoDinoKn2KYY1fkow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<555870E8 DOT 7040302 AT iki DOT fi>
	<CAA2C=vDhD6BJj89o1i0FRd2U0H4bTpGGN4zH6qs7FJKxzqhuQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505180114 DOT t4I1EiaX017288 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCyrQ_+Yq6XsRD-UO4r=j9WoGGiXoqQFrkbiEQpzX+=MA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201505181216 DOT t4ICGaKO014123 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCk5MY74z+HNVzzdLByg71Y_9ObK-1jPxJ_KF8eqRDZMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83zj52dkns DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vAPcN+MKC_2tcZqVmo9gvF2Cxdo+K+-qfKaNrQuCkMnEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83wq05eukk DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
	<CAA2C=vBKihqvw152LsGvWEiSei7TczN6Vmxsvebtnoz_E5=u4g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83twv9espx DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:59:05 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA2C=vC8ge-O+yDkTeXf351E+bpURkxOGmvdp19JTMnCjfkZbA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1
From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 5/18/15, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:13:12 +0300
>> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
>>
>> >> --- strtod.d.bak
>> >> +++ strtod.d
>> >> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
>> >>  strtod.o: strtod.c ../../../../include/libc/stubs.h \
>> >>    ../../../../include/locale.h ../../../../include/math.h \
>> >>    ../../../../include/stdlib.h ../../../../include/sys/djtypes.h \
>> >> -
>> >> /usr/local/cross-djgpp/lib/gcc/i586-pc-msdosdjgpp/3.4.6/include/float.h
>> >> \
>> >>    ../../../../include/float.h ../../../../include/errno.h \
>> >>    ../../../../include/ctype.h ../../../../include/inlines/ctype.ha \
>> >>    ../../../../include/inlines/ctype.hp \
>> >>
>> >> As you see, -nostdinc does prevent compiler's own headers from being
>> >> used. But with current cvs as it is, we are telling the compiler to
>> >> do use its own headers: Not a good idea IMO.
>> >
>> > Are you sure the compiler doesn't use that header when it sees
>> > "-nostdinc"?  Could it be that it just doesn't put that header into
>> > the dependencies?
>> >
>>
>> Joke, right?
>
> You mean, you are joking by asking whether I am?
>

This is ridiculous.. To answer your original question, yes I am sure.
Did you even try to reproduce what I said?  If you ever bother to do
so, you can even add -save-temps to the cflags and compare the
assembler outputs to see what I am saying.