X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:49:30 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1
In-reply-to: <CAA2C=vBKihqvw152LsGvWEiSei7TczN6Vmxsvebtnoz_E5=u4g@mail.gmail.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <83twv9espx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com> <CAA2C=vAjN-HamFRWCQak=QF_NPjR5-TBYZw1U5707MO0b=qXkw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <554DF584 DOT 4020309 AT iki DOT fi> <CAA2C=vDaOJb_RW2bQEFoM_cqwp7yhzwX-CB328r5GCCi6XcooA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55501DAD DOT 1080604 AT iki DOT fi> <CAA2C=vAvMW-yquZLSN=Z39NU24Kqf7urjan90801i7BDTdqOvQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55579278 DOT 8090301 AT iki DOT fi> <CAA2C=vBaQKzmch_buxFm20DJLcG+zv6d6803+qMEx=baA4Frog AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <555829A6 DOT 8010502 AT iki DOT fi> <CAA2C=vA73qPvoDFytp3FeW6bCD1-XuGsFFoDinoKn2KYY1fkow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <555870E8 DOT 7040302 AT iki DOT fi> <CAA2C=vDhD6BJj89o1i0FRd2U0H4bTpGGN4zH6qs7FJKxzqhuQg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201505180114 DOT t4I1EiaX017288 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAA2C=vCyrQ_+Yq6XsRD-UO4r=j9WoGGiXoqQFrkbiEQpzX+=MA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201505181216 DOT t4ICGaKO014123 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAA2C=vCk5MY74z+HNVzzdLByg71Y_9ObK-1jPxJ_KF8eqRDZMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <83zj52dkns DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
 <CAA2C=vAPcN+MKC_2tcZqVmo9gvF2Cxdo+K+-qfKaNrQuCkMnEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <83wq05eukk DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vBKihqvw152LsGvWEiSei7TczN6Vmxsvebtnoz_E5=u4g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:13:12 +0300
> From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
> 
> >> --- strtod.d.bak
> >> +++ strtod.d
> >> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> >>  strtod.o: strtod.c ../../../../include/libc/stubs.h \
> >>    ../../../../include/locale.h ../../../../include/math.h \
> >>    ../../../../include/stdlib.h ../../../../include/sys/djtypes.h \
> >> -  /usr/local/cross-djgpp/lib/gcc/i586-pc-msdosdjgpp/3.4.6/include/float.h
> >> \
> >>    ../../../../include/float.h ../../../../include/errno.h \
> >>    ../../../../include/ctype.h ../../../../include/inlines/ctype.ha \
> >>    ../../../../include/inlines/ctype.hp \
> >>
> >> As you see, -nostdinc does prevent compiler's own headers from being
> >> used. But with current cvs as it is, we are telling the compiler to
> >> do use its own headers: Not a good idea IMO.
> >
> > Are you sure the compiler doesn't use that header when it sees
> > "-nostdinc"?  Could it be that it just doesn't put that header into
> > the dependencies?
> >
> 
> Joke, right?

You mean, you are joking by asking whether I am?