X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 10:43:12 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org)" Subject: Re: bad pragma in dir.h? (and our structrure packing) In-reply-to: <55556DFF.8020400@iki.fi> X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Message-id: <831tiii8vj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k2wcjt8e DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83bnhojnwh DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <838ucsjnbl DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83vbfvi3t1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <5554DF05 DOT 7020707 AT iki DOT fi> <55556DFF DOT 8020400 AT iki DOT fi> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 06:54:39 +0300 > From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi)" > > We need to be sure that such typedef will not cause warnings about unused typedef for some GCC > versions. Which GCC versions do that? How can they produce such warnings without complaining about system header files, which are replete with unused typedefs? At the very least, they should exempt header files, or at least system header files, which these are. So I find it hard to believe this could be a problem.