X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2uTZQTIGUGMX5GrVyZFplcjVjfWhPtupCXrq03TevYo=; b=lMehX3HNdCJ4/mo3DCuIuw1oBraEd52xKI+vG7/8pCytlEQ+BlZWzcrI4sfVGEL8zL Id3j/PmOUyrw9Z4tZbvhA8g7VQMSlEV0bJQQ5E4t6DggWA/Z5LOjD202h2Dw/EVz1SjP b9wbCVoROsSA75TdeIoL4RCZe/jMU8XlcnHrcp6WCTuGGOTo3j/KBtpL7GlpnVHKXRh5 T4r5mxa+39Sf0ZgxhCI55qDk2n3R+EfTlwrugJBzxJesUfwjDwz3ckhFhIWVjDHyZo2q RIkOwMMVGuhMInysIO3Necn4IjrroQo4KIgFc72WxvAtniGAeJZZdlC+jdcQFG5RaVBJ x0AA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.102.142 with SMTP id i14mr2354120ico.90.1430984474173; Thu, 07 May 2015 00:41:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201505042003.t44K3odg011007@delorie.com> References: <201505042003 DOT t44K3odg011007 AT delorie DOT com> Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 10:41:13 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP 2.05 beta 1 From: "Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com)" To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 5/4/15, Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) wrote: > This is announcement of DJGPP 2.05 beta 1 > > It has numerous changes since previous DJGPP 2.04 beta 1 release in 2003. > (http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp-announce/2003/12/06/22:18:05) > Unfortunately DJGPP v2.04 was never released and old beta version slowly > became almost unusable together with other newer DJGPP packages. > > More information about changes in DJGPP 2.05 beta 1 is available at > > http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/doc/kb/ > > both in sections about changes in 2.04 and 2.05. The same information is > also > available in file info/kb.inf in djdev205.zip > > It needs a lot of testing. Please test it if you have time and/or are > interested in any of the above features. Any level of testing would be > appreciated. Andris's r1.14 change to src/makefile.ic (to add gcc's own include directory to CFLAGS) defeats djgpp's float.h DBL_MIN and DBL_MAX macros: with djgpp's folat.h, they are defined to __dj_double_min and __dj_double_max symbols, however gcc's float.h undefines them and redefines them as floatiing point constants. Therefore, with and without the r1.14 change to src/makefile.inc being in effect, the binary output of several sources, such as strtod.c, differ. Not noticed before, or not cared about? (BTW, why are we defining DBL_MIN/_MAX as __dj_double_min/_max and not as constants?)