X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Received: by 10.66.182.166 with SMTP id ef6mr38272986pac.42.1430718585187; Sun, 03 May 2015 22:49:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.95.135 with SMTP id i7mr200771qge.27.1430718584922; Sun, 03 May 2015 22:49:44 -0700 (PDT) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 22:49:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 References: <201504280005 DOT t3S05t2U020439 AT delorie DOT com> <201504281718 DOT t3SHIpWZ009266 AT delorie DOT com> <55434021 DOT 4010606 AT iki DOT fi> <5543C6E6 DOT 4090709 AT iki DOT fi> <201505011838 DOT t41Icjxw030105 AT delorie DOT com> <5543CB2D DOT 7070903 AT iki DOT fi> <201505011857 DOT t41Ivl50030704 AT delorie DOT com> <90da07be-91b3-4778-aed2-c02643ffd1ea AT googlegroups DOT com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <74becbc1-6118-41c4-a008-36fb33d86663@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Martin's CVS tar.gz file (was: Re: GCC 5.1.0 problem with ) From: "rugxulo AT gmail DOT com" Injection-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 05:49:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Bytes: 2337 Lines: 19 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Hi, On Sunday, May 3, 2015 at 7:47:05 AM UTC-5, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > Martin Str|mberg wrote: > > rugxulo AT spam DOT sux wrote: > > > > > http://www.ludd.luth.se/~ams/djgpp/cvs/ > > > djgpp.cvs.tar.gz 28-Oct-2014 06:03 2.6M > > Updated today. Let's see if cron job kicks in tomorrow. djgpp.cvs.tar.gz 04-May-2015 05:06 2.6M A quick diff of the two shows many changes (including 2015 inclusion of malldbg.h and sysquery.h), so I guess it's fixed. BTW, no, I didn't try to rebuild it myself. I am not a FreeDOS kernel developer, but I have recently recompiled 2041 myself, so backporting the NUL fix from (still unreleased) 2042pre shouldn't be impossibly hard.