X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received: by 10.236.82.115 with SMTP id n79mr33779687yhe.35.1381796175942;
        Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.136.133 with SMTP id qa5mr407987igb.4.1381796175730; Mon,
 14 Oct 2013 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201310100549.r9A5nXbp028237@delorie.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:7:f00:2ca:2c74:8761:63ea:136f;
 posting-account=05hOMwoAAAB6R8xtiQKzEljSMzgOhVF1
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:7:f00:2ca:2c74:8761:63ea:136f
References: <l2g4gv$11km$1 AT adenine DOT netfront DOT net> <201310020453 DOT r924rSXt007186 AT delorie DOT com>
 <87347957-e083-4d30-8f41-416847a8bf08 AT googlegroups DOT com> <201310051637 DOT r95GbMQZ005928 AT delorie DOT com>
 <90de5b80-9990-46b4-a382-be9e4cd44b9a AT googlegroups DOT com> <201310100549 DOT r9A5nXbp028237 AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <62cd9990-428a-4116-bce7-e585f41db91c@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin-to-DJGPP cross compiler
From: Jim Michaels <jmichae3 AT yahoo DOT com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:16:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Bytes: 2149
Lines: 25
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Wednesday, October 9, 2013 10:49:33 PM UTC-7, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > I've never heard of such a thing.  Cygwin's compiler is gcc, just like
> 
> > > DJGPP's.
> 
> > 
> 
> > http://www.redhat.com/services/custom/cygwin/
> 
> > it's gcc, but it's somehow different.
> 
> 
> 
> Heh.  That's the group *I* work in.  It's just gcc.  The custom
> 
> licensing is for the cygwin-specific runtime library, for customers
> 
> who wish to not need to GPL their own applications just because
> 
> they're built with cygwin.  The custom support is just support.  The
> 
> license for the version of gcc in cygwin, any version of cygwin, is
> 
> still plain GPL.

I am confused - it's GPL but it's not GPL? can't be both.