X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: incompatible Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 36 Message-ID: <8c88b7a7-3679-4bd5-a706-cc66e78468a2@n42g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> References: <16cd2 DOT 48279178 DOT 3ce778e4 AT aol DOT com> <9ef90c14-7c8b-4229-87aa-eeced2556395 AT ec4g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337395566 29411 127.0.0.1 (19 May 2012 02:46:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 02:46:06 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: n42g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/10.0.630.0 Safari/534.16,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 2844 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id q4J302sf011579 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On May 18, 8:59 pm, "Rod Pemberton" wrote: > "Rugxulo" wrote in message > > news:9ef90c14-7c8b-4229-87aa-eeced2556395 AT ec4g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com... > > > Strange to say, but our best bet may indeed be piggybacking atop > > a lean TtyLinux with DOSEMU. At least DOSEMU with DJGPP > > works fast on either 32-bit or 64-bit. > > Windows 98/SE provided DPMI support to Windows "console" applications. Right, that was part of the advantage of DPMI. > IIRC, I've seen attempts at DPMI with Linux, perhaps that was LRMI ... ? LRMI hasn't been (mostly) updated since 2005 (with a tiny CVS patch in 2008). It's the same dude (Josh Vanderhoof) who once wrote the Cross- ELF minimal toolset for DJGPP (and Linux and Win32). Dunno, seems more like just an easier way to call the (v)BIOS, perhaps meant moreso for gfx mode stuff, dunno. > Do you know if there is a DPMI host designed specifically to work with DOSEMU > and Linux?  If there was a Linux DPMI host for DOSEMU, then it should be > faster or better than a DOS based DPMI host under DOSEMU on Linux. DOSEMU only uses its own built-in DPMI host, so you don't have a choice. It seems to work fine, but it's not fully DPMI 1.0 compatible (not that most are either), though it does support the undocumented extended int 21h API also. Faster or better depends on a lot of things, but it's pretty good (though you might have to increase available DPMI RAM to it, default is too low).