X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: internal compiler error with c++11 features on 4.6.2 Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:21:31 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 38 Message-ID: <44fc3a6e-50cd-4ff5-b69c-01363f6972e9@g7g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> References: <64237354-a1d5-4c03-b446-b7de61297344 AT a2g2000prb DOT googlegroups DOT com> <500942d9-99ce-4845-9c96-237bf349c27e AT g1g2000pri DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1322441378 20612 127.0.0.1 (28 Nov 2011 00:49:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: g7g2000vbd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0,gzip(gfe) Bytes: 3018 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id pAS1024Q020442 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Nov 27, 6:00 pm, jimm wrote: > > I can't wait until they put boost in there with TR2. It's either wait or roll your own. Though lucky for you C++ is a very popular language with good support. So it shouldn't be too long. > I have been > waiting for decimal128 math and compare that is case > insensitive - what were the designers thinking? ... > :-) "long long long int" ? :-) They probably think you can just use GMP lib, stricmp / strcasecmp, etc. (Or roll your own. Or use a different language.) > many needed improvements...  initializer lists should have been done a > long time ago. G++ has always been pretty good and available since late '80s, I think, but even other people admit it only truly got great around 4.2. I think one guy [who?] then called it the "best in the world" at that point [citation needed]. As for adding more stuff, there will always be more to add. Sometimes you have to stop inventing and start stabilizing, implementing, etc. This is why C++11 only has stuff from circa 2006 or such [citation needed]. Bjarne Stroustrup probably doesn't want to sweat blood working on such standards for the rest of his life. It's already hard enough to implement (e.g. GCC uses a hand- written parser and not Bison [citation needed]). > I also think 128-bit integers should be available now, > since we have GUIDs and UUIDs. and GPT. > also, you can't represent SI and IEC units sufficiently without them. But what's the command to burn a Blu-Ray disc? Users demand it! ;-)