X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:28:13 +0300
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: Re: Isues concerning the INT 21 Windows95 - LONG FILENAME FUNCTIONS (0x71XX) implementation.
In-reply-to: <CAA2C=vDWWQX7AjDMDp+Qo-8yzzSP8GopF9tkrDjYBHFn_G3EnA@mail.gmail.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <8362ktx1te.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201109101340 DOT 47663 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <83vct04a4x DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vBkMD34-KBtp0hMbQ3Ppk8gavXJjkddDq_2hjzUA7PYHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E1R49TJ-000696-92 AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vDWWQX7AjDMDp+Qo-8yzzSP8GopF9tkrDjYBHFn_G3EnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:33:20 +0300
> From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
> 
> 2. any fixes went into 2.04 which I have trouble handling because
> 2.03 branch is very much not compilable by gcc-3+.

You mean, 2.04 has trouble being compiled with GCC 3.x, right?
Because I know of no problems with compiling v2.03 with GCC 3.

> AFAIU, no LFN stuff were in 2.03, yes?

What do you mean by "no LFN stuff"?  DJGPP supports LFN since v2.02 if
not before that.

> If yes that means 2.03 knows nothing about LFN stuff and _can_
> result in FS corruption??

No.  I use v2.03 on Windows for the past 10 years, 6 years out of them
on XP, and I have yet to see any sign of such problems.