X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:47:09 -0400
Message-Id: <E1R49TJ-000696-92@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:
	<CAA2C=vBkMD34-KBtp0hMbQ3Ppk8gavXJjkddDq_2hjzUA7PYHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	(message from Ozkan Sezer on Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:48:06 +0300)
Subject: Re: Isues concerning the INT 21 Windows95 - LONG FILENAME FUNCTIONS
 (0x71XX) implementation.
References: <201109101340 DOT 47663 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
	<83vct04a4x DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vBkMD34-KBtp0hMbQ3Ppk8gavXJjkddDq_2hjzUA7PYHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:48:06 +0300
> From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
> Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> 
> What is the status of this issue?

No one followed up.

> On a related note which of v2.03r2 and v2.04-20110904 is
> more suitable for use (with or without the above LFN issues
> addressed) ?

Depends on your preferences, I guess.  If you want a stable and proven
library, use v2.03.  If you want fancy new features (like symlinks),
use v2.04.