X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
To: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
CC: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <201101191925.46252.juan.guerrero@gmx.de> (message from Juan
	Manuel Guerrero on Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:25:46 +0100)
Subject: Re: Difficulries with GDB 7.2 compiled with DJGPP
References: <201101152018 DOT 51379 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <201101190016 DOT 02772 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> <E1PfZPj-0005DP-0P AT fencepost DOT gnu DOT org> <201101191925 DOT 46252 DOT juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
Message-Id: <E1Pfhzf-0003FN-Hr@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:03:15 -0500
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:25:46 +0100
> Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
> 
> > How come the v2.03 build avoided this issue?
> 
> 
> config.sub produces for an input string that contains "djgpp" the hardcoded
> output string "i586-pc-msdosdjgpp".  config.guess uses uname to detect the
> processer type.  This script concatenates the output produced by "uname -m"
> together with the string "pc-msdosdjgpp".  The 2.04 version of uname returns
> "i786" but the 2.03 version of uname returns "i586".  In those cases we get for
> the 2.04 version:  i786-pc-msdosdjgpp and for
> the 2.03 version:  i586-pc-msdosdjgpp.

Can you suggest a change in config.sub that would accommodate both
v2.03 and v2.04?  If so, please submit that change to config.sub
maintainers.

Thanks.