X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: D. Borca's old ELF fork: mirror needed, DPMI cross-referencing
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <8ad41aa2-6453-4851-aae0-368d04de4804@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <5e9570db-ab42-4639-8be0-fa379184a4f7 AT o10g2000yqa DOT googlegroups DOT com> 
	<83ocmunw2f DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <200911222338 DOT nAMNc3F4029885 AT delorie DOT com> 
	<aa19671c-5e44-489b-82ec-bf9fd7553093 AT p36g2000vbn DOT googlegroups DOT com> 
	<200911232318 DOT nANNIKok011648 AT delorie DOT com> <45c9cb3b-fae5-4b4c-9b06-bed5c0931015 AT p8g2000yqb DOT googlegroups DOT com> 
	<hg6hqn$len$1 AT aioe DOT org> <200912142351 DOT nBENpwZf002663 AT delorie DOT com> 
	<hg6qlq$uqj$1 AT aioe DOT org> <767d4dff-4750-4897-877a-4970450b81d5 AT g26g2000yqe DOT googlegroups DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1260858278 25367 127.0.0.1 (15 Dec 2009 06:24:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:24:38 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; 
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) 
	AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.33 Safari/532.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes: 2370
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi again,

On Dec 15, 12:05=A0am, Rugxulo <rugx DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 8:00=A0pm, "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_h DOT  DOT  DOT  AT nohavenot DOT cmm> wrote:
>
> > "DJ Delorie" <d DOT  DOT  DOT  AT delorie DOT com> wrote in message
>
> >news:200912142351 DOT nBENpwZf002663 AT delorie DOT com...
>
> > > That's an impressive list. =A0How many of those implemented DPMI 1.0 =
?
> > > (not that it matters any more, sadly)

Forgot to mention FreeDOS-32 and DOSEMU although the latter is much
more complete (and not almost abandoned), esp. re: DPMI 1.0. Also, Rod
mentions DOSBox, but AFAICT it never had built-in DPMI support (or
perhaps it's not enabled by default???), always relied on apps
themselves to support it (e.g. CWSDPMI).