X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: release 3 of the DJGPP port of GNU Bash 2.04 uploaded.
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <b6959a78-9b55-431b-8ccf-1026d0211455@m11g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
References: <200909210306 DOT n8L36FrR016815 AT delorie DOT com> <918d28f7-d449-438e-9fdf-3d320139d34c AT m11g2000vbl DOT googlegroups DOT com> 
	<4AB74C1A DOT 4090904 AT iki DOT fi> <4AB7C115 DOT 7080208 AT iki DOT fi> <4fbf12be-e43a-4713-9ee4-b439044a358b AT b18g2000vbl DOT googlegroups DOT com> 
	<cef09b56-bec6-4889-a632-6c300d4c0dca AT l34g2000vba DOT googlegroups DOT com> 
	<82c47a7b-a96e-4d27-855b-71d44c861ad6 AT q14g2000vbi DOT googlegroups DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1254178476 6116 127.0.0.1 (28 Sep 2009 22:54:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: m11g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; 
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) 
	AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.21 Safari/532.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Sep 27, 2:48=A0pm, Rugxulo <rugx DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>
> Does this mean nobody wants/needs a 2.04 binary? So Andris' 2.03pl2
> compile is good enough? Honestly, I just want a bugfixed version of
> 2.05b put on the FTP server so nobody encounters the shell function
> bug. Should I package it and FTP upload it myself to /incoming, DJ? (I
> just don't want anybody overlooking this.)

Well 2.04r3 and 2.05br3 are both there now (and on a mirror too). So I
guess it's moot. Thanks again to Andris and DJ.   ;-)