X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Hey Rod Pemberton Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 37 Message-ID: <5742b59c-3f48-4449-9e85-3ac30a664f19@b14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1250799264 30156 127.0.0.1 (20 Aug 2009 20:14:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: b14g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/530.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/2.0.172.39 Safari/530.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Aug 19, 6:21=A0pm, presidentbyamendment wrote: > On Aug 19, 7:16=A0pm, presidentbyamendment > wrote: > > > Yes Forreal Mode works. I have some code, > > but it's in my own assembler in Bash. The thing is, you have to > > handle interrupts in 8086 mode, i.e. you have 66/67h IRET. > > > Rick Hohensee > > presidentbyamendment.com > > votescript =A0 cLIeNUX =A0shasm =A0 H3rL =A0 H3sm =A0 =A0libsys.a > > And it looks like > > ftp.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim/Forreal.tgz > > works. Yes, and it has osimplay (newer name for shasm) included, apparently. I saw this about two years ago and never tested it. Same with GForth, got interested but never got very far in the tutorial. Apparently, this is what he says (doc/actualmodes): PE=3D0 Dbit=3D0 (un)Real Mode PE=3D0 Dbit=3D1 Forreal Mode PE=3D1 Dbit=3D0 Veal Mode (BKA "286 task") PE=3D1 Dbit=3D1 Protected Mode I'm only vaguely aware of FASM using "flat real" mode (else DPMI if available). But Tomasz (etc.) on the http://board.flatassembler.net forum would be more knowledgable about this than me (although I frequent there too). Comp.lang.asm.x86 is up and running again last I checked, but I haven't kept up.