X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: "Rod Pemberton" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Hey Rod Pemberton Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:05:55 -0400 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 57 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: pldq+kT97bAAp/ObDwnZyQ.user.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse AT aioe DOT org X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1933 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.7.9 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1933 Cancel-Lock: sha1:yDxOyq0zwlZOAHr2iqZxemzcedM= X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "presidentbyamendment" wrote in message news:e4d5d107-93af-4379-8198-ca7211f52395 AT l35g2000vba DOT googlegroups DOT com... > On Aug 19, 7:16 pm, presidentbyamendment > wrote: > > This is Rick Hohensee. Are you sure? (I mean, from the subject line "Hey ..." I would've guessed "hutch--" out of NSW AU... If hutch--, haven't they caught you yet? PDT timezone thru DC on .edu?) > > Yes Forreal Mode works. I'm interested in the technicalities of "Forreal Mode," e.g., how and why, just to improve my understanding of the x86 cpu. It seems possible that the combination of bits could be settable. However, there is no documentation that they can be and I suspect they can't be. It'd be much easier for someone with an ancient 386 with the 386 LOADALL instruction to verify proper operation of "Forreal Mode." Unfortunately, your descriptions in old posts weren't as informative _to me_ as I'd have preferred. I haven't had the time to work through, or rework, your code. > > I have some code, > > but it's in my own assembler in Bash. The thing is, you have to > > handle > > interrupts in 8086 mode, i.e. you have 66/67h IRET. > > > > Or something like that. I don't have the interest or time to confirm. Honestly, I can't think of a good use for this mode... I've mentioned "Forreal Mode" a few times in various assembly newsgroups - to spur more interest. Sorry, it seems that no one is interested in obscure modes, except maybe "unreal" mode when used in a bootloader. Maybe you should mention it in a group oriented towards technical details of the x86 cpu. > > Right now I'm running for President :o) Is he running away from you? (joking) ;-) > > And hello to Randy Hyde if he's around. He's not here, AFAIK. He does post every great once in a while to alt.lang.asm and comp.lang.asm.x86 just to mention updates to his HLA. > And it looks like > > ftp.gwdg.de/pub/cLIeNUX/interim/Forreal.tgz > > works. ... Rod Pemberton