X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Which editor do you use? Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 21 Message-ID: <647a1e03-3910-424d-a584-226f2b06fc8c@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> References: <89cdd25e-6ef5-4e85-aff5-0dbcb852ca3f AT g20g2000vba DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1241678955 1468 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2009 06:49:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:49:15 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.10) Gecko/2009042316 Firefox/3.0.10 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On May 6, 6:22=A0pm, Glaux wrote: > > I tried most of editors mentioned here. I like Borland styled IDE so I > still use RHIDE for DJGPP coding (and DOS Navigator for other files). > Unfortunatelly RHIDE is dead and it's doesn't work 100% well under > WinXP (e.g. when compile it switch to fullscreen or sometimes crashes > or debugger don't work with new gcc) but for me it's still the best... I think JED, GNU Emacs, FTE, TDE, VIM, etc. can all jump to GCC compiler errors via "C-x `" (backtick) or so. JED has a Borland-ish mode, and GNU Emacs has CUA mode. Anyways, RHIDE is internally based upon SETEDIT, so try that if you really want. P.S. I can't remember exactly, but I think RHIDE's GDB only works with COFF, so you may have to compile with "-gcoff" else it prefers Dwarf. When / if Eli finished GDB 7.0, that would make it that much easier (I assume) for someone to update RHGDB with it, if it ever gets resurrected. Don't hold your breath, though (but do feel free to help him if possible).