X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:27:32 +0300
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs 22.3 and Vista
In-reply-to: <71364059-5397-43ac-ac6d-61ba76de60b1@y7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <83iqlc2tsr.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
References: <c6f1ce2a-c0a9-45ec-992f-1e2925f53a72 AT r28g2000vbp DOT googlegroups DOT com> <uk564jmew DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <7b67b41d-4ec9-4d49-9e15-2b2db729e8cf AT 3g2000yqk DOT googlegroups DOT com> <ueiwcji5g DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <e9d6710f-e784-4d0e-90a2-deda66c286e5 AT e3g2000vbe DOT googlegroups DOT com> <u4ox7kafm DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83fxgoda43 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <c7c81398-f473-42b4-b6d9-2d3c4bedfc59 AT g37g2000yqn DOT googlegroups DOT com> <83ws9t358x DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <6fe30866-6add-4c07-93dc-47e56462a597 AT z9g2000yqi DOT googlegroups DOT com> <83vdpd329z DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <f5509665-5037-4f7b-b71b-8868ddace192 AT l1g2000yqk DOT googlegroups DOT com> <83r6012dgn DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83ocv43nu3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <71364059-5397-43ac-ac6d-61ba76de60b1 AT y7g2000yqa DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
>=20
> On Apr 10, 3:38=A0am, Eli Zaretskii <e DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
> >
> > Oh, and btw, there is (always was) a lot of DOS ports of Sed, mv,=
 and
> > rm floating around, long before they were ported to DJGPP, so fin=
ding
> > them should not be a problem.
>=20
> I've tried many many seds for DOS, and most aren't very useful. Eve=
n
> if you can workaround the limitations and bugs (not always possible=
),
> you're still very limited. For simple stuff, it doesn't matter. But=
 if
> you depend on anything more than that, you need a good one.

Building Emacs doesn't need anything fancy from Sed, just the ``simpl=
e
stuff''.

> Concerning mv and rm, they would almost definitely have to accept l=
ong
> cmdlines and regex

Not for building Emacs.