X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:07:58 +0300
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Subject: Re: GNU Emacs 22.3 and Vista
In-reply-to: <c7c81398-f473-42b4-b6d9-2d3c4bedfc59@g37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <83ws9t358x.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
X-012-Sender: halo1 AT inter DOT net DOT il
References: <c6f1ce2a-c0a9-45ec-992f-1e2925f53a72 AT r28g2000vbp DOT googlegroups DOT com> <uk564jmew DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <7b67b41d-4ec9-4d49-9e15-2b2db729e8cf AT 3g2000yqk DOT googlegroups DOT com> <ueiwcji5g DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <e9d6710f-e784-4d0e-90a2-deda66c286e5 AT e3g2000vbe DOT googlegroups DOT com> <u4ox7kafm DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83fxgoda43 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <c7c81398-f473-42b4-b6d9-2d3c4bedfc59 AT g37g2000yqn DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 12:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
>=20
> > I've just fixed this in the Emacs CVS with the following change:
> >
> > 2009-04-04 =A0Eli Zaretskii =A0<e DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gnu DOT org>
>=20
> Okay, it works, I've built it on XP successfully (GCC 4.2.3 + BinUt=
ils
> 2.17 + DJGPP 2.04) using SYSTEM_MALLOC. Tested to run okay on Vista
> also.

Thanks for testing, and for making it available to others.

> P.S. Way too many Changelogs. And there are 10 copies of COPYING, h=
eh,
> is that really necessary?

They say it is.  IANAL.

> In a perfect world, all the docs would be .gz'd in order to save
> space after unpacking (since auto- compression can mostly
> transparently read 'em).

On a Unix system, "make install" does that, but I never bothered to d=
o
the same for DJGPP, since (a) disk space is cheap these days, and,
more importantly, (b) doing so would require gzip to be installed for
the docs to be accessible, which IMO is an annoyance.