X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Which editor do you use? Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 65 Message-ID: <7c2bf159-c640-48d0-96ed-af920b1147e0@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> References: <73mdrsFvhhebU1 AT mid DOT individual DOT net> <26b8b849-581a-491c-8642-6817b0a2c35d AT n8g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1239139565 5653 127.0.0.1 (7 Apr 2009 21:26:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:26:05 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U; en) Presto/2.1.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Apr 7, 11:53=A0am, "Rod Pemberton" wrote: > "Rugxulo" wrote in message > > news:26b8b849-581a-491c-8642-6817b0a2c35d AT n8g2000vbb DOT googlegroups DOT com... > On Apr 3, 7:47 am, Rugxulo wrote: > > > > If anybody is really interested, I could post (or perhaps link to) my > > > DOS text editor feature comparison list. (It's fairly informative but > > > could always be improved.) > > > Well, hopefully Rod P. at least will find this comparison interesting: > > Actually, I was thinking it might strike a chord with Jim Leonard. =A0But= , it > seems you're aware of his older editors page, and already tried to "discu= ss" > other editors with him... =A0:-) I only discussed it very very briefly with him a few months back. I think he's tired of me by now. ;-) > Previously, > > > > I don't see the appeal of MS EDIT, esp. since it always expands tabs > > > (IIRC). I'm not saying it's bad, just there are better editors out > > > there. > > Well, I for one *HATE* tabs in code. I don't think you're alone. http://www.texteditors.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?TabsVsSpaces http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?TabsVersusSpaces http://www.jwz.org/doc/tabs-vs-spaces.html http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/NoTabs http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/TabsAreEvil > I always end up converting them to > spaces or a space, and reformatting or re-indenting. =A0The only use I've= ever > found for them is to align columns of data. =A0But even then, I find usua= lly > need to remove them for some reason, or other... =A0They're just a major > nuisance. Recently I had the crazy idea to switch to hard tabs (via TDE.CFG). I honestly forget why, maybe makefiles, but I eventually ran into some subtle incompatibilities that annoyed me, so I switched back. Besides in TDE I can toggle the Tab key to make "RealTabs" at runtime if needed (Shift-Alt-T). But I mostly never use real tabs anyways (although most make utils won't work without 'em, which I find silly). But it's still odd for an editor to always expand 'em. Anyways, at least MS EDIT finally supported multiple file windows in Win95, but they haven't updated it since. And one FreeDOS guy liked the interface so much that he recently decided to clone it: http://mateusz.viste.free.fr/dos/en/download.php?plik=3Dmsedit P.S. Looking through CWS' ED sources today, I noticed lines with a LOT of tabs. I'm talking about eight, nine, 10 tabs at the beginning of a single line! Whew! ;-)