X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: themouse Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Installing DJGPP questions Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 43 Message-ID: <34785c16-1639-4598-b93b-10eac8ac7641@g38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> References: <3fa4a12c-c4b1-44fd-8f55-4abc9547d333 AT w34g2000yqm DOT googlegroups DOT com> <200903192016 DOT n2JKGJ4l019039 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1ab1c44d-77f0-400e-b66f-570f0092d52a AT a12g2000yqm DOT googlegroups DOT com> <84fafd17-56ce-4920-aa4a-5748a3713177 AT c11g2000yqj DOT googlegroups DOT com> <51bb47eb-3d12-40fb-9835-d17fc61b0e79 AT e18g2000yqo DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.83.80.194 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1237994968 13638 127.0.0.1 (25 Mar 2009 15:29:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:29:28 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: g38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.83.80.194; posting-account=mk-1hQoAAABRHA7wwAt_3thfjpGkh8Qu User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; GTB5; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; MS-RTC LM 8; InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com >If you're using Win XP, it's recommended to use stuff >compiled with 2.04, all found in /beta/ in each announcement URLs. I am doing FreeDos only. Currently only what is on the official release, I have not applied any updates, yes but its all on there. Waiting on a wireless PCMCIA that supports DOS. :) Well I might through linux on there too in a partition in case I need something a little more sophisticated. > > Anything I do I would want to put on sourcefudge. so an SVN client > > would be a good place to start. :) > > Sounds like way too much work. I would try something a bit simpler and > reasonable if I were you. > There is a command line client that exists already, debugging the port will, I think help me quite a bit, I will get used to seeing C++ code again, and troubleshooting debugging is something I am quite good at, I think. > In case you haven't noticed, there are still dedicated people > interested in DOS, but more volunteers would be nice. As such, it's > hard to release such big projects without outside help. So don't > expect 2.04 any time soon. I really want to and I plan too, but I don't know how to do lower level programing "hardware/OS direct" yet. I plan too though. I just first need to get my feet wet. Then learn assembly. If I am just using freedos to develop on then the current version is good? I am just trying to get the right setup. I want to make the transition from doing windows programming with the fancy IDE, intellisense smoothly. While at the same time have the most current header libraries and functionality I can. You have been extremely helpful and I really appreciate it. ~theMouse