X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Rugxulo Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Status of DJGPP Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <200903161615 DOT n2GGF4Wl014905 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <49BFBB27 DOT 1060103 AT roosnek DOT nl> <049d5089-2807-4d51-a256-b599fcf89c91 AT d19g2000yqb DOT googlegroups DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1237357075 23823 127.0.0.1 (18 Mar 2009 06:17:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 06:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com Injection-Info: v15g2000yqn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Hi, On Mar 17, 11:28=A0am, themouse wrote: > > I am sure they are , I actually have a copy of Borland 4.5 on 20 > floppies. :P That's more than my copy of Win95 !! (But they were overformatted.) ;-) > But DJGPP is open source and GCC. Since I am interested in creating a > lite port of xwindows for dos but want it to be portable in case > anyone wanted > to port my lite version back. The old v1 Xlibemu supposedly let you compile GNU Emacs for it, but almost no one seems to have ever tried or used it (strangely). I wonder if it was any good. Anyways, that's not compatible with v2, so it's fairly moot. But at least Emacs is one of the best example apps for such a thing (multiple frames visible at once, fonts, etc.), IMO. > [BEGIN SOAPBOX-- you can skip if you want :P] > And I don't think QuickC or WatcomC are open source. Correct me if I > am wrong. > The #1 best way to support open source is to use the software. That > way the efforts of people like DJ don't go to waste. OpenWatcom is indeed open source, and it's quite nice (multiple targets from same host, small .EXEs, reasonable speed) although DJGPP has various advantages (LFNs, faster output code, POSIX). If you want 16-bit DOS or any OS/2, Win3.x support (as well as Win32s or WinNT or DOS32), it's the place to go. They're both quite good, obviously. http://www.openwatcom.org news://openwatcom.contributors news://openwatcom.users.c_cpp (also available on Google Groups) > That being said, thank for your responce. I plan to install lots of > different software. > I'll add those to my list. I may need them. :) I've got links to a billion DOS-related things on my site. It's meant to be a one-stop list (albeit a bit messy) to find things (and be a living bookmark, where I can easily click to see if something updated). For instance, FreeDOS kernels, shells, tools, etc. http://rugxulo.googlepages.com