X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: djgpp on 386
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:19:05 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <c69ce477-d488-40e4-8e1f-9bf14995de02@q11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
References: <598659 DOT 78008 DOT qm AT web31913 DOT mail DOT mud DOT yahoo DOT com> <89823734-86ca-4c73-b8d8-9e08f564223c AT m40g2000yqh DOT googlegroups DOT com> 
	<u4oz2skns DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <P82dnamamOMztQ_UnZ2dnUVZ_qHinZ2d AT earthlink DOT com> 
	<200902110132 DOT n1B1Wh6e027044 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.13.115.246
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1236273545 13522 127.0.0.1 (5 Mar 2009 17:19:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:19:05 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: q11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; 
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.7) 
	Gecko/2009021910 Firefox/3.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Feb 10, 7:32=A0pm, DJ Delorie <d DOT  DOT  DOT  AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> gcc 1.9?
>
> The first djgpp-built gcc was 1.37.
>
> Maybe you meant djgpp 1.09?

Ah, I see, 1.35 was the first but was cross-compiled. And 1.37 was the
first to build on DOS itself.

http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/history.html

"The first version that made it big was djgpp 1.03, which can still be
found in a few shareware catalogs, even though 1.03 was pre-grok-
copyleft, and those shareware dealers are distributing it illegally."

Was this due to PharLap or something else? Anyways, just for laughs, I
accidentally found GCC 1.36 on Funet.Fi using "our own version of
'run386' (with source code - yes)", is that legal?? I don't think
anybody in their right mind wants to run it, though.    ;-)