X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Recipient: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xiKYykjGxL8/LyeV79dxWC5WNxxRxOZIn+S4NDAR5gI=; b=M5Od0ZII/Zc3jczgAhgud4a46XJ+Xy6pdv+Ns7o3misjnuvXtvFuHYVbH7kQtiECQK EoouT5iaqGfdlq6KANBLdbsdD6tH2BqKgxBl4cms5TwRJ9+FpKkKHYHilW6qQ1HSsya5 xRNXohFbd+VaEe+Eo+XzveV4F+vQ646wwcsJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oltESmRVbzx0C2eyt5HNj21mfv7MuxLQFXLibVFhp+t8n2luLOH9URT30S6G3HAPeF 2L07ZJsdmrMRHLG0Y/AKbqjvrc2rOykPJnFUAld1srZzY0ZqaJqh/X+fJzQBv0ME1y9B rRbSH8CRKhpBNoLC9VniOFXB60Ig30b8nPoS0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <7705c9030902091323q48d59667x468b0c3bb0e4025f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <7705c9030902100003x55552d4awb02e6d3597a28814 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <7705c9030902100127u37036fb4v39b4750dad3013da AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:18:10 -0800 Message-ID: <7705c9030902100918g41674550nce5009a68727f895@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: DJGPP termios From: Blair Campbell To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk >> Could this possibly be a bug in termios? > > Not enough information to tell: who called `putc'? ncurses did. how could calling putc result in a null dereference bug though? > > The functions you named are all part of the low-level termios > infrastrucure, which hooks the normal stdio output routines to > redirect them to BIOS calls. The interesting information is in the > functions that did the actual output. >