DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
  b=4JuNM1Ejd4Wr8cwlBbAhB2/aKezwqfkw7RxeumlsjYts9PpIChkkj1klWaQzsi8ectTzVII4FiiFL8RW1E2qv/+sZ4wyvnSR7IxXp5v3nB+ey+fE7d8jgVixuFFwFFiBD7mQRFFktJq9O5hqIrWHaxCYy9LkDVQQAmxIDbkl9iQ=;
Message-ID: <86689.39265.qm@web31901.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:01:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Levent Yavas <mlistlev AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: djgpp on 386
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


Hi!

I'm using djgpp (gcc 2.95.2) for quite some time on my
old 8Mb 386dx40. I'm using it as a learning tool for
dos programming, so, optimizations aren't required.

I have to select fastest but most bugfixed version of
djgpp program combination. gcc-2.95 series was quite
popular at time, in spite of gcc-3.x. So, I suppose
2.95.3(this is latest in 2.95 isn't it?) is good
canditate as a fast and correct compiler for 386. (If
some older versions that are faster and
non-problematic let me know)

And what djgpp dev kit, binutils versions that I have
to select? Are there any incompatibilities with
gcc-2.95.3? I suppose i can use latest versions of
rhide, make and cwsdpmi.

my list is:
v2/djdev203.zip
v2apps/rhid15ab.zip
v2gnu/bnu219b.zip
v2gnu/mak3791b.zip
v2misc/csdpmi5b.zip

Please make me suggestions

Levent Yavas