X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Message-ID: <46A7504A.8080802@roosnek.nl> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:29:46 +0200 From: Nico Roosnek Organization: roosnek research & development User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070509 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: a rare error occurs (DJDEV203, RHIDE 1.5ab with GCC4.12 ) References: <46A73661 DOT 2070909 AT roosnek DOT nl> <46A745CA DOT 5010508 AT iki DOT fi> In-Reply-To: <46A745CA.5010508@iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000760-1, 07/25/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Andris Pavenis wrote: > Nico Roosnek wrote: >> Dear DJ, >> >> I very much enjoy the package DJGPP for real time processing (16 >> hydrophones/32 microphones , chirps, Kalman estimation, etc.). >> However since a month a rare error occurs. >> >> I use DJDEV203, RHIDE 1.5ab with GCC4.12 compiler version. >> Since I changed from GCC3.77 code running errors are produced in case of >> large programs (1.2 Mbyte with debugging), >> for example the variable argc has a wrong value. >> It has nothing to do with wrong programming, while it started almost in >> the beginning and no memory allocation or graphics routines are used. >> Is there any incompatibility between these packages. >> The same happens for MSDOS on one computer and WIN98 on a notebook. >> Thus the code produced by the packages is wrong. >> (I use DJGPP almost 5 years, starting with the GCC2.95 ) >> >> Could you inform me about any incompatibility? >> > As far as I remember my last build of RHIDE was using GDB-6.3. I don't > remember which version was used in RHIDE-1.5a - perhaps GDB-6.1.1. > Both these versions are old and most likely the support of new GCC > versions (like GCC-4.1.2 or 4.2.0) is not expected to be very good. > > From the other side it's highly unlikely that there will be new > releases of RHIDE. The way how RHIDE uses GDB is a dead end and it's > only a time when it would fail totally with new GDB versions. I don't > however know if it is already so with already existing GDB versions as > I have neither used nor built RHIDE for at least 1.5 years. > > Andris > > In the meantime I went back to GCC3.44 + the up to that time utility programs with Rhide15ab and dev203 and every thing works fine with the Allegro 4.21 I do not know where it goes wrong. Thus some peculiarity is present in that combination. In the near future I will follow your advice. Thanks for your help. With regards, Nico