X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From: Glaux <glaux AT centrum DOT cz>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DPMI 0.9+ and 1.0 providers
Date: 6 May 2007 18:42:24 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <1178502144.669916.139170@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
References: <20070503225934 DOT GE21994 AT sfbrgenetics DOT org>
   <463a878c DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.176.103.125
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1178502145 3243 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2007 01:42:25 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 01:42:25 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <463a878c.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info: o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.176.103.125;
   posting-account=79KgoA0AAADKuOLK3k0Y3qVqk-KGfm77
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Are there some performance differences between DPMIONE and CWSDPMI?
And have DMPI 1.0 some advantages for DJGPP programs ? I Expect if the
run under DPMI 0.9 it doesnt have any effect the presence of DPMI 1.0.
I use CWSDPMI and also like CWSDSTUB to make my program compact if
needed for some case.
BTW are there some newer CWSDMI than 6-test?