X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 68.147.232.190 From: Brian Inglis Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Sequence points, any? Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: References: <1144238453 DOT 674596 DOT 302360 AT z34g2000cwc DOT googlegroups DOT com> <200604051406 DOT k35E6iOx002313 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1144285170 DOT 583086 DOT 24610 AT v46g2000cwv DOT googlegroups DOT com> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 32 Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:27:33 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.135.176 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT shaw DOT ca X-Trace: pd7tw3no 1144290453 64.59.135.176 (Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:27:33 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:27:33 MDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com fOn 5 Apr 2006 17:59:30 -0700 in comp.os.msdos.djgpp, "Bob W" wrote: >DJ Delorie wrote: >> Could you send me your .i and .s files? Use --save-temps to tell gcc >> to save all the intermediate files. > >After reading Hans-Bernhard Broeker's post I am >now fully convinced that gcc is allowed to use its >new optimisations, whether I like them or not or >whether performance on my machine improves >or not. > >I hereby officially withdraw my suspicions that >gcc might be producing a bug when compiling >the sample code with I have placed at the end of >my previous post. > >Therefore I guess there is no more need to >send you the files you've requested. However, >if you still think you'd need them anyway, please >let me know. The compiler should not be rearranging the order of calls to external functions specified in separate statements, unless there were some other factors involved that it could infer. -- Thanks. Take care, Brian Inglis Calgary, Alberta, Canada Brian DOT Inglis AT CSi DOT com (Brian[dot]Inglis{at}SystematicSW[dot]ab[dot]ca) fake address use address above to reply