X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:29:15 +0300
From: alex bodnaru <alexbodn AT 012 DOT net DOT il>
Subject: Re: UDP implementation?
In-reply-to: <slrnd8eoo3.1uo.drososa@eternity.mydomain.org>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <1116185355.12365.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <slrnd8eoo3 DOT 1uo DOT drososa AT eternity DOT mydomain DOT org>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

hi,

search wattcp-32.

alex

On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 14:56 +0000, A. Drosos wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> I am involved in a project where we are measuring throughput between two
> network devices (on powerlines). The hardware works. However, in one of the 
> testing modules we are using Windows XP and the copy command to transfer a 
> large file from one PC to another. WinXP has a large overhead here. 
> 
> Is it possible to use some UDP implementation (straight data - no error
> correction whatsoever) in a DOS like op sys (the minimum possible overhead)?
> I was thinking that there may already be something implemented in DJGPP.
> 
> Any recommendations welcome.
> 
> Tasos