X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f Message-ID: <4101ca01$0$177$cc7c7865@news.luth.se> From: Martin Str|mberg Subject: Re: top posting Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp References: <003e01c46b01$84546800$0d01a8c0 AT josepmariaxp> <3pCLc.170124$tH1 DOT 6880991 AT twister DOT southeast DOT rr DOT com> <41012fe1$0$172$cc7c7865 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <4101b619$0$175$cc7c7865 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <200407240128 DOT i6O1SYjn018665 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.6-20020816 ("Aerials") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.6Q (alpha)) Date: 24 Jul 2004 02:31:29 GMT Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: speedy.ludd.ltu.se X-Trace: 1090636289 news.luth.se 177 130.240.16.13 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ Delorie wrote: >> 1. I'd appreciate it if you DIDN'T top post. > Bottom posting is not a requirement in this forum. Blind readers > prefer top posting too. When properly trimmed, it doesn't matter what > you do, and it becomes more obvious where the text goes (above, > between, or below the inclusion text) depending on the context. Indeed, I (almost) always cut my replies to what I consider is relevant. And I said "I'd appreciate...". >> : That would seem to make sense. I also noticed that what ever > Also, ':' is not the standard inclusion marker, '>' is. Many > news/mail readers look for the '>' to reformat textual messages. You're right. I've change back to that now. I don't remember why I changed it to ":" but there should have been some reason, so I might go back to ":" if I remember WHY I changed it to start with. Hmm. Perhaps it should be "> " too, instead of ">"? Advice? Right, MartinS