X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date: 01 Dec 2003 07:51:40 +0200
Message-Id: <ur7zpjdar.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <bqdvtc$a24$1@au-nws-0001.flow.com.au> (bdeck@lycos.co.uk)
Subject: Re: [OT] LaTeX
References: <3fc73157$0$38256$91cee783 AT newsreader01 DOT highway DOT telekom DOT at> <002f01c3b5cc$d2530d80$5929120b AT T21jSANCHEZ2> <bqdvtc$a24$1 AT au-nws-0001 DOT flow DOT com DOT au>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "bdeck" <bdeck AT lycos DOT co DOT uk>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:02:53 +0100
> 
> Latex distribution is a disaster.

But the DJGPP port of the TeX stuff is not.  See:

  ftp://ftp.delorie.com/pub/djgpp/current/v2apps/tex/

(I already posted a message in this thread pointing to this resource,
so I kinda wonder why do people continue discussing problems with
unported distributions.  Isn't the DJGPP port good enough for some
reason?)