X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: Raf256 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Allegro, djgpp 3.02 Date: 3 Dec 2001 08:46:28 GMT Organization: aa Lines: 25 Sender: raf256 AT poczta DOT onet DOT pl@chello062179025129.chello.pl Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: chello062179025129.chello.pl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1007369188 17729 62.179.25.129 (3 Dec 2001 08:46:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT onet DOT pl NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Dec 2001 08:46:28 GMT User-Agent: Xnews/4.06.22 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote in news:Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1011202145332 DOT 9372C-100000 AT is: >> 3. imho djgpp 3.02 build+complie time is much (50%) longer then 2.95, >> is this true ? > Compiling C programs or C++ programs? C++ > If you are talking about C programs, I see something like 30% slow-down > in compilation speed. I don't know about C++, but it won't surprise me > if it were much slower, since it now supports a much larger language > than before. I installed GCC 3.02 and compiled simple hello world program, but with 2 files, like a.cc calling void Hello(); and b.cc + b.h with void Hello() definition/declaration, imho building took more time then on GCC 2.95 -- Raf256 ,--, _ ,- _ _ _ ,---------------------------------------------, |,-'`_|_|_ `_||_'|_' | raf256 AT go2 DOT pl | `\|_| | |_,,_||_| |