X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f From: "bdeck" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.apps Subject: Re: MOUNT.EXE Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:00:09 +0200 Organization: Tiscali Germany Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <7ce56313 DOT 0309220111 DOT 61b9da4a AT posting DOT google DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p62.246.4.26.tisdip.tiscali.de X-Trace: ulysses.news.tiscali.de 1064314297 39053 62.246.4.26 (23 Sep 2003 10:51:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT tiscali DOT de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 10:51:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "Hans-Bernhard Broeker" wrote in message news:bkmils$md3$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE... > In comp.os.msdos.djgpp Sébastien WILLEMIJNS wrote: > > > i've seen MKISOFS/CDRTOOLS for MS-DOS but i think i must use > > MOUNT.EXE, > > Why do you think so? > > > it is available for MS-DOS ? > > No... the whole idea behind mount doesn't exist in MS-DOS. Very interesting... I have always wondered what it would take to make the virtual directory table on DJGPP ("i.e. /dev/env/DJDIR, /dev/d, /dev/c, /dev/com1, etc...) extensible. Perhaps a mock 'mount' and 'umount' executable could add additional devices and physical directories (even commands) to the DJGPP.ENV.... Just an idea... Ben