From: "DH Lee" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: Hi, is there any commercial program compiled with DJGPP? Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 11:36:32 +0900 Organization: Hanaro Telecom Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <200306102056 DOT h5AKubnJ009675 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.39.244.178 X-Trace: news.hananet.net 1055299191 3873 218.39.244.178 (11 Jun 2003 02:39:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsadmin AT hanaro DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 02:39:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com "DJ Delorie" wrote in message news:200306102056 DOT h5AKubnJ009675 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com... > > > > I heard the game 'Quake' has compiled with DJGPP.. > > > > Not quite. Quake was compiled with GCC which DJGPP is a port of, > > therefore you can and I have downloaded the source code in accordance > > with the Gnu Public License agreement, but most references I've seen > > to the development of the Quake series refer to both Unix and Linux > > servers as the machines they were developed on, and indeed a lot of > > the language is more familiar to me from X Windows than Windows. > > Not quite. Quake 1 is itself a DJGPP application. All the nearptr > stuff was funded by Id, and for a while we swapped developers (we got > one of theirs, they got one of ours) to do debugging and performance > work. > > This isn't why the Quake 1 sources are available - the GPL in no way > influenced that, since Quake 1 was itself NOT GPL. The mere act of > compiling something with gcc, even with djgpp, does not cause it to > fall under the GPL. > > The Quake build servers were quad alphas with unix-to-djgpp cross > compilers on them. And before anyone asks "how do you know", I know > because I was one of the people involved in setting them up. well, it's a little bit different.. how's it resolved concerning license if DJGPP sutff (esp. DPMI) is utilized to develop/distribute commercial dos application? According to legal restriction term on DJGPP application, it says ok just to include the infomation in product's documents on how to get DJGPP. Are there any other agreements except this? and would you let us know any commercial dos s/w built over DJGPP?