From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: gcc assembler error 19
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:19:17 +0100
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <3EADB6F5.5190BDA9@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References: <20030428175136 DOT 3216 DOT qmail AT web13001 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.136.12.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk 1051573069 6204 62.136.12.10 (28 Apr 2003 23:37:49 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Apr 2003 23:37:49 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Thomas Tutone wrote:
> 
> "charles woerner" <charleswoerner AT hotmail DOT com>  wrote:
> 
> > I am new to C and have installed the gcc-2.952
> > compiler as part of your
> > DJGPP version2 environment.
> 
> That version of gcc is _really_ old - several years
> old, I think. That suggests you got your version of
> djgpp off a CD-ROM included in some book, rather than
> downloading djgpp off the net.  You should completely
> remove your installation of djgpp from your computer,
> then go to
> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/zip-picker.html
> 
> to download the current version of djgpp.  Follow the
> installation directions provided there very carefully,
> paying particular attention to the instructions
> regarding your path. Among other things, the current
> version behaves better with Win2K and WinXP than the
> older version you apparently have.

The advice about the compiler is a bit bogus. gcc 2.95.x are perfectly good
versions of gcc. Reinstalling djdev203 may be worth it, though, to get all the
Windows 2000 & XP bugfixes that are present in djdev203 refresh 2.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]