From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Bug 00314 -- div() still broken
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:14:04 CDT
Organization: Rice University, Houston, TX
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <3ea5785c.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References: <fA9pa.20115$1s1 DOT 299825 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <dsbaavskl0dei9epnr9t4qnu2nn16d96sj AT 4ax DOT com> <3EA54F78 DOT C46438ED AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3EA57418 DOT 2060506 AT cyberoptics DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: clio.rice.edu
X-Trace: joe.rice.edu 1051031957 3869 128.42.105.3 (22 Apr 2003 17:19:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rice DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:19:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-NewsEditor: ED-1.5.9
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> One big question for me is how div() could get fixed in the CVS tree on 
> 2000-07-08, but the 2.03 libc.a, dated 2001-12-24, still contained the 
> old, buggy div().  It appears that the 2.03 tags didn't get updated.

Because I missed this fix when I did the update.  There were thousands
of changes in CVS - but most of them were new feature related.  I searched
check-in descriptions for "bug" and asked the workers if there were any
other bugs I hadn't found.  This one was missed, sorry.

I need to add this to my list of things still broken in the v2.03 update.