Message-ID: <3EA2AA17.F568EC74@yahoo.com>
From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization: Ched Research
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Missing headers/libraries - what next
References: <IHEAIGJEFNKKKDPFCPECOEFGCBAA DOT dockeen AT mchsi DOT com> <3EA2137B DOT C276F678 AT yahoo DOT com> <3EA269EB DOT A03AAE40 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 28
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:35:41 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.90.170.129
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1050849341 12.90.170.129 (Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:35:41 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 14:35:41 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
> CBFalconer wrote:
> [snip]
> > I.E. rtffaq :-) Now why didn't I think of that!  Looks as if
> > Richard Dawes libsocket would fill in the gaps.  I am totally lost
> > when it comes to these things, sockets, networks, etc.
> >
> > I see that lsck073 is dated 1998!  Is this viable for 2.03?
> 
> libsocket 0.8.0 (ls080) is the last release from the middle of 2002. It should
> work fine with 2.03, although I have no idea how well it compiles with later
> gcc 3.x's.
> 
> Note that it doesn't work very well with anything later than Windows '95,
> because the Winsock 2 support isn't very good. It's also unsupported.
> 
> But if you're trying to get something to compile, it might do the job.

I looked for later versions on Simtel, and didn't see any (or am
blind).  Maybe because I was looking for lsck*.  Also I am using
W98 here.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!