From: Cesar Rabak <csrabak AT uol DOT com DOT br>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Weekly Mini-FAQ post for DJGPP
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 12:02:23 -0300
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <3E75E37F.2070804@uol.com.br>
References: <200303170600 DOT h2H601p24580 AT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 200-221-14-196.speedy.speeduol.com.br (200.221.14.196)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1047913243 72401450 200.221.14.196 (16 [39218])
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; pt-BR; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,es,en
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie escreveu:
>             This is the Mini-FAQ for djgpp.     $Date: 2003/03/10 10:23:55 $
[snipped]

> Latest Versions
> ---------------
> 
> djdev-2.03p2 binutils-2.13 bash-2.04 bison-1.35 diffutils-2.8 emacs-20.5
> fileutils-4.1r5 find-4.1 flex-2.5.4 gawk-3.1.1 gcc-3.2.1 gdb-5.3r2

Am I wrong, and version 3.2.2 of gcc still is not considered 'in 
production' or we should update to gcc-3.2.2?


-- 
Cesar Rabak
GNU/Linux User 52247.
Get counted: http://counter.li.org/