Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:37:12 -0500
Message-Id: <200303101237.h2ACbCM16536@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <200303101412.54939.pavenis@latnet.lv> (message from Andris
	Pavenis on Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:12:54 +0200)
Subject: Re: Compiling GRX 245
References: <002101c2e3fc$181e0700$0300a8c0 AT rivasaiicfa DOT com DOT ar> <8296-Sat08Mar2003112133+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <b4ht7e$otf$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> <200303101412 DOT 54939 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Also. I completely agree that it would perhaps be better to name updated 
> version as 2.04 and perhaps the next version as 2.10

2.10?  What happened to 2.05 through 2.09?