From: jazzyjeff34 AT hotmail DOT com (Klytu)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Updating DJGPP
Date: 14 Feb 2003 23:29:32 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <250404d5.0302142329.4540c5e9@posting.google.com>
References: <250404d5 DOT 0302131216 DOT 66f5d518 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <2ibp4v070k4r02dndgikcbat09pgd55r6m AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.2.44.39
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1045294172 10712 127.0.0.1 (15 Feb 2003 07:29:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Feb 2003 07:29:32 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Andrew Cottrell <andnews AT ihug DOT com DOT oz DOT au> wrote in message news:<2ibp4v070k4r02dndgikcbat09pgd55r6m AT 4ax DOT com>...
> >I noticed that gcc version 3.2.2 was released last week. Will the
> >latest version of DJGPP work if gcc 3.2.2 is substituted for gcc
> >3.2.1?
> 
> So long as you have the GCC 3.2.2 binary files that have been built
> for DJGPP. They do exist, but they have not had allot of testing yet
> as you can see there has not been much time from the FSF release to
> now.
> 
> I have re-built GCC 3.2.2 on XP and have done a number of complete
> rebuild of most of the binary packages that people  use and so far
> they work.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew

Thanks for the information.