Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 12:42:51 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <3405-Sat01Feb2003124250+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to: <3e39ed6c.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> (message from Charles Sandmann
	on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 21:28:44 CST)
Subject: Re: Command line wildcard expansion under Win2K
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030130095126 DOT 2797A-100000 AT is> <3e394a9a DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <b1c3go$5d2$1 AT sass2141 DOT sandia DOT gov> <3791-Thu30Jan2003235135+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3e39ed6c DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 21:28:44 CST
> > 
> > Why don't they say v3p4*.vec or V3P4*.VEC?
> 
> Because years of using DOS/Windows showed no difference in any
> other applications?  Yes, you can retrain the users, but it's
> not intuitive for them why it should be different.

DJGPP does deviate from DOS/Windows in small ways, mostly in order to
support Unix-like behavior where necessary.  This is one of those
cases, I think.