From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Release 4 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:04:51 +0000
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <3DF70DC3.2D0826E5@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
References: <200212100839 DOT gBA8dam32378 AT delorie DOT com> <3DF63BCD DOT D4AD0DDB AT yahoo DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.136.88.227
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news7.svr.pol.co.uk 1039601570 18642 62.136.88.227 (11 Dec 2002 10:12:50 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Dec 2002 10:12:50 GMT
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language: de,fr
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

CBFalconer wrote:
[snip]
> Is there any particular reason for not identifying the zip as
> being revised, such as "fil41-4.zip"?  There is no clue to this in
> the mini-faq postings.

We could include this information in the mini-FAQ, e.g.: "fileutils-4.1 rel.
4" or "fileutils-4.1r4", if "fileutils-4.1 release 4" takes up too much space.

I wonder what DJ thinks.

Bye,

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]