Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 22:04:03 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id: <2110-Mon09Dec2002220401+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: "Riccardo Fantoni (Pastore)" <rfantoni AT ts DOT infn DOT it>
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.44.0212091855370.16117-100000@axpts2.ts.infn.it>
	(rfantoni AT ts DOT infn DOT it)
Subject: Re: conflict.
References:  <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0212091855370 DOT 16117-100000 AT axpts2 DOT ts DOT infn DOT it>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:58:42 +0100 (MET)
> From: "Riccardo Fantoni (Pastore)" <rfantoni AT ts DOT infn DOT it>
> 
> some file utilities (ls.exe for example)
> conflict with the scrollbar of the
> command shell. Is there any workaround
> for this problem ?

I don't think there is a work-around, sorry.  Any DOS program that
accesses the video memory directly will cause this unpleasant
side-effect.  I consider this a misfeature of the NT family of
Windows.