From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: rhide
Date: 26 Nov 2002 22:18:21 GMT
Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <as0rvd$rrd$1@nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
References: <F120LKw5ZmrylLGP6i400015db8 AT hotmail DOT com> <3DE24752 DOT E27BCD1E AT ma DOT tum DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1038349101 28525 137.226.32.75 (26 Nov 2002 22:18:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Nov 2002 22:18:21 GMT
Originator: broeker@
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Waldemar Schultz <schultz AT ma DOT tum DOT de> wrote:
> 1)During compilation I get in the message window:

> Compiling: mdl15r.c
> mdl15r.c(38) Error: 1: warning: "UEB_FAC" redefined
> mdl15r.c(33) Error: 1: warning: this is the location of the previous
> definiti

> Q1: shouldn't stay a warning a warning rather becoming an error ?

No.  Redefinition of things is, generally, an error.  Some exceptional
cases are only warnings.  Without seeing your source, it's impossible
to be sure.
-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.