From: "A. Sinan Unur" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: about: aout.exe Date: 26 Nov 2002 20:07:58 GMT Organization: Cornell University Lines: 34 Sender: asu1 AT cornell DOT invalid (on 128.253.251.141) Message-ID: References: <3DDFA0CA DOT 000009 DOT 03244 AT DELL> <63b211f7 DOT 0211240900 DOT a1f0a57 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <63b211f7 DOT 0211250711 DOT 7d6a37a5 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <63b211f7 DOT 0211261124 DOT 5adfc6a7 AT posting DOT google DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.253.251.141 X-Trace: news01.cit.cornell.edu 1038341278 7968 128.253.251.141 (26 Nov 2002 20:07:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT news01 DOT cit DOT cornell DOT edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Nov 2002 20:07:58 GMT User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com shayoom AT hotmail DOT com (Jonquil) wrote in news:63b211f7 DOT 0211261124 DOT 5adfc6a7 AT posting DOT google DOT com: > question, why didnt you add the return 0; line? AFAIK, in standard C++, if no return statement is present in main, a value of 0 will be assumed. > is it the new compiler, or is C++ changing... someone mentioned that > C++ changes... is that so true?? i thought it was just the versions of > GCC thats are changing to make the coding easier for us, no? as the C++ language evolves, gets standardized etc, gcc versions change to keep up. have you heard of www.google.com? > in the old way, my programs run using aout.exe (i have no idea where > is came from or what it stands for!) http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/chist.html > PS i know i ask so many things, and you guys have been really patient > with me.. thank you :) it is still your responsibility to make sure you have read the FAQ's for comp.lang.c, comp.lang.c++, and comp.os.msdos.djgpp, as well as the documentation for the software you are using. -- A. Sinan Unur asu1 AT c-o-r-n-e-l-l DOT edu Remove dashes for address Spam bait: mailto:uce AT ftc DOT gov