Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:46:59 -0500
Message-Id: <200211051346.gA5Dkx817350@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <CAC03AD3B71FD41195CC00508B6A7EAB02ACAAE5@TOR8> (message from
	STRZELCZYK Andrzej -NUCLEAR on Tue, 5 Nov 2002 08:24:31 -0500)
Subject: Re: Is gcc-3.2 an official versions
References:  <CAC03AD3B71FD41195CC00508B6A7EAB02ACAAE5 AT TOR8>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> gcc version 3.2 has been available on the
> djgpp-official-release-web-page for few months, while per weekly
> mini-faq the latest version is 3.1. Which data is right?

gcc 3.2 is the latest.  The mini-faq has already been updated.

> Are there more similar discrepancies?

If the mini-faq differs from the ftp sites, the mini-faq is wrong.
It's a manually maintained file, so if you spot any other
discrepancies, let us know.