Message-ID: <3D80854A.BA8E7322@lml.ls.fi.upm.es>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 14:15:06 +0200
From: Manuel Collado <m DOT collado AT aaron DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: List of DJGPP packages
References: <3D7735B1 DOT F752E6DA AT lml DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es> <200209071414 DOT g87EEPV13625 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3D7DD581 DOT CAD1BBE7 AT lml DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es> <3D7E54C9 DOT 593DC70F AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 138.100.10.20
X-Trace: 12 Sep 2002 14:16:33 +0100, 138.100.10.20
Lines: 39
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
> [snip]
> One solution to this problem is to write DSMs for all the legacy packages and
> put them in a package, e.g.: djgpp-legacy-dsms. pakke actually comes with DSMs
> for some legacy packages.

I wasn't aware of that. I'm rebuilding the package list by using also
data from these dsms. In doing so, I've collected the present status of
dms availability:

Folder         Listed   Internal-dsm  External-dsm  With-dsm 
Without-dsm
                 (1)        (2)           (3)          (4)        (5)
------------  --------  ------------  ------------  -------- 
-----------
v2               20          9             6           15          5
v2apps           82         14             8           22         60
v2apps/tex       38          2            36           38          0
v2gnu           308        141            45          186        122
v2misc           35          4             5            9         26
v2tk            108         12             4           16         92
v2tk/allegro     36          0             0            0         36

      Total     627        182           104          286        341
                                                     (46%)      (54%)
(1) Listed in 00_index.txt
(2) The .zip archive contains a dsm file
(3) No dsm inside .zip, but there is one in pakke database
(4) = (2) + (3)
(5) = (1) - (4)

Roughly, half the package archives already have dsms, and figures are
better if we consider only the most recent version of each package. With
some (hopefuly moderate) effort, minimal dsms could be build for every
remaining package.

-- 
To reply by e-mail, please remove the extra dot
in the given address:  m.collado -> mcollado